In his first TV interview since being shot in the back by police, Jacob Blake admitted that he not only had a knife in his possession at the time of the shooting, but that he also had it. “Let go” before taking it back. “I realized that I had dropped my knife, I had a small pocket knife. So I picked him up after I got away from him because they assigned me and I ran into him, ”Blake told Michael Strahan in an interview that aired Thursday on Good Morning America (GMA) on ABC. “I shouldn’t have picked it up, just considering what was going on,” he continued. “At that time, I wasn’t thinking clearly. Earlier this month, Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley said he would not press charges against Officer Rusten Sheskey, who shot Blake seven times, as the officer was acting in self-defense against an armed aggressor. Blake was also arrested for resisting police with a knife. Blake’s confession contradicts earlier statements by his family and lawyers, who denied having a knife in their possession when police shot him down on August 23, in an incident that stemmed from a 911 call carried out by the mother of Blake’s children, who told police Blake was trying to leave in his rental car with two of his sons. “My son didn’t have a gun,” Blake’s father told the Chicago Sun-Times for an Aug. 25 report. Patrick Salvi Jr., a lawyer for the Blake family, told CNN on August 26 that Blake did not have a knife in the car. “Witnesses confirm that he was not in possession of a knife and that he did not threaten the police in any way,” Blake’s lawyer, Ben Crump, said in a statement issued on the 27th August. At the time, Blake had a warrant for his arrest. on charges of trespassing, disorderly conduct and third degree sexual assault, which the operator passed on to the officers who responded. With the felony charges outstanding, police were required by law to take Blake into custody. In the interview with GMA, Blake also claimed that “I hadn’t done anything, so I didn’t feel like they were there for me,” although investigators found out later than before. arrest, Blake had searched for his own warrant on a police website and sent a text mentioning the warrant. ABC made no mention of either fact in the interview. The shooting went viral on social media after it was videotaped, showing officers yelling at Blake to “drop the knife”. In the following days – which included deadly violence, riots and looting – the Criminal Investigations Division of the Wisconsin Department of Justice revealed that Blake admitted to having “a knife in his possession.” But much of the mainstream press initially said he was “unarmed”. The governor of Wisconsin called the National Guard on Monday to help quell unrest after police shot dead unarmed black man in the latest incident this summer to stir up cries of injustice and divide a nation over the emergency to make a fundamental change to law enforcement, “read the August 24, August 24, the Post was pushed back after upholding Blake’s” unarmed “description by reporting authorities’ decision not to not prosecute the police. Although the newspaper corrected the account, a story published on January 5 still refers to Blake as “unarmed.” The Post did not return a request for comment on the gap. In the days following the shooting, CNN ran several articles describing Blake as “unarmed” that have yet to be corrected. “Video shows police shoot unarmed black man” is a current link to an August 24 segment hosted by CNN presenter Jake Tapper. An August 28 USA Today “fact check” titled “Jacob Blake Did Not ‘Wield’ a Knife, Obtained a Gun Before Kenosha Police Fired” argued that “Blake did” nothing in the video taken by viewers, “while noting that the clip” shows something in Blake’s hand, but the resolution is low, so it could be a knife. ” But rather than release a correction or retraction on January 5, PolitiFact simply updated the post with an editor’s note that prosecutors revealed that “Blake was armed with a ‘razor blade type knife. ‘when he was shot by police. The explanation? “This does not affect the rating of this element, as the ratings are based on what is known at the time.” In other words, it was true.